Saturday, November 17, 2018

Illinois becomes the 21st State of the Union on December 3, 1818.

Illinois entered the Union on December 3, 1818. The twenty-first state takes its name from the Illinois Confederation (Illiniwek; Illini)— a group of Algonquian-speaking tribes native to the Mississippi Valley. The Algonquian word, “Illinois” means “tribe of superior men.”

Though Illinois presented unique challenges to immigrants unaccustomed to the soil and vegetation of the area, it grew to become a bustling and densely populated state.
The strange but beautiful prairie lands east of the Mississippi and north of Lake Michigan presented a difficult challenge to the tide of westward-moving immigrants. Accustomed to the heavily forested lands of states like Kentucky and Tennessee, the early immigrants to Illinois did not know what to make of the vast treeless stretches of the prairie. Most pioneers believed that the fertility of soil revealed itself by the abundance of vegetation it supported, so they assumed that the lack of trees on the prairie signaled inferior farmland. Those brave souls who did try to farm the prairie found that their flimsy plows were inadequate to cut through prairie sod thickly knotted with deep roots. In an “age of wood,” farmers also felt helpless without ready access to the trees they needed for their tools, homes, furniture, fences, and fuel. For all these reasons, most of the early Illinois settlers remained in the southern part of the state, where they built homes and farms near the trees that grew along the American Bottom.

The challenge of the prairies slowed emigration into the region; when Illinois was granted statehood in 1818, the population was only about 35,000, and most of the prairie was still largely unsettled. Gradually, though, a few tough Illinois farmers took on the difficult task of plowing the prairie and discovered that the soil was far richer than they had expected. The development of heavy prairie plows and improved access to wood and other supplies through new shipping routes encouraged even more farmers to head out into the vast northern prairie lands of Illinois.

By 1840, the center of population in Illinois had shifted decisively to the north, and the once insignificant town of Chicago rapidly became a bustling city. The four giant prairie counties of northern Illinois, which were the last to be settled, boasted population densities of 18 people per square mile. Increasingly recognized as one of the nation’s most fertile agricultural areas, the vast emptiness of the Illinois prairie was eagerly conquered by both pioneers and plows.

Compiled by Neil Gale, Ph.D  

Friday, November 16, 2018

Is an Indian Tribe one of the Twelve Lost Tribes of Israel?

The United States has the world's second-largest Jewish population. The Chicagoland area has the third-largest U.S. Jewish population, with New York and Los Angeles areas being first and second.

In either 3rd or 4th grade Sunday school, we discussed the 12 tribes of Israel and the 10 lost tribes with our Rabbi, Joseph M. Strauss (who lived to be 98 years old). We were the founding Rabbi of Temple Menorah in the West Rogers Park neighborhood of the West Ridge Community in Chicago, leading the discussion.

Rabbi Stauss told us that some Indian tribes have some Jewish-type traditions. I recall him talking about the Cherokee tribe (which I will address further in the article) and Indian tribes in the Midwest. After my intensive study of the Mississippi Valley Indian tribes, I can see where some of the tribes of the Illiniwek treat the Great Spirit similarly to how Judaism teaches.

sidebar 
This article does not try to prove or disprove the theory of one of the twelve Lost Tribes of Israel came to America by way of the Indigenous people. Some have said: "It's a simple presentation of folklore."

Introduction
In the 8th century BCE, the Assyrians dispersed the Kingdom of Israel, giving life and legend to the Lost Tribes [1][2]. 

TRIBES                 HEBREW
Reuben                 (רְאוּבֵן‎ Rəʼūḇēn)
Simeon                  (שִׁמְעוֹן‎ Šīməʻōn)
Levi                        (לֵוִי‎ Lēwī)
Judah                     (יְהוּדָה‎ Yəhūdā)
Issachar                 (יִשָּׂשכָר‎ Yīssāšḵār)
Zebulun                  (זְבוּלֻן‎ Zəḇūlun)
Dan                        (דָּן‎ Dān)
Naphtali                 (נַפְתָּלִי‎ Nap̄tālī)
Gad                        (גָּד‎ Gāḏ)
Asher                      (אָשֵׁר‎ ’Āšēr)
Benjamin                (בִּנְיָמִן‎ Bīnyāmīn)
Joseph                   (יוֹסֵף‎ Yōsēp̄)
JOSEPH LATER SPLIT INTO TWO HALF TRIBES:
   ├ Ephraim (אֶפְרַיִם‎ ’Ep̄rayīm)
   ├ Manasseh (מְנַשֶּׁה‎ Mənašše)

The repatriation of these lost tribes eventually became an integral part of the Jewish–and Christian–-messianic dream, and there have been Lost Tribe speculations about numerous "discovered" populations. One of the most fascinating — and unfortunately forgotten — such discussions centered on Indigenous Americans. How did the greater Jewish community in America respond to this?

The Theory Begins
Notice the man in this photograph has "Payot," long-curled or braided sideburns. Payot is worn by some men and boys in the Orthodox Jewish community based on an interpretation of the Biblical injunction against shaving the "corners" of one's head. Literally, Payot means "corner, side, edge" in Hebrew.



Comment
Neil - Very interesting article. I did a little further research and... tell me if I'm crazy, but the headgear that the native is wearing looks to me a lot like the Shtreimel, the traditional round fur hat worn by Orthodox Jewish men. I tried to post pics of two examples, but wasnt able to in this post. I'll try to send it by email.  Rand Eller
Two examples of the traditional Orthodox Jewish Shtreimel headdress for comparison to the headdress of the Native American. Courtesy of Rand Eller.




One of the first books to suggest the Native American Lost Tribe theory was written by a Jew, the Dutch Rabbi, scholar, and diplomat Manasseh ben Israel. In
The Hope of Israel (1650), Ben Israel suggested that the discovery of the Indigenous Americans, a surviving remnant of the Assyrian exile, was a sign heralding the messianic era. Just one year later, Thomas Thorowgood published his bestseller Jews in America, or Probabilities that Those Indians Are Judaical, which was made more probable by some additionals to the former Conjectures.

The Lost Tribe idea found favor among early American notables, including Cotton Mather (the influential English minister), Elias Boudinot (the New Jersey lawyer who was one of the leaders of the American Revolution), and the Quaker leader William Penn.

The notion was revived after James Adair, a 40-year veteran Indian trader and meticulous chronicler of the Israelitish features of Native American religion and social custom, wrote The History of the American Indians . . . Containing an Account of their Origin, Language, Manners, Religion, and Civil Customs in 1775. Even Epaphras Jones, an American Bible professor, engaged the theory in 1831, claiming that anyone "conversant with the European Jews and the Aborigines of America . . . will perceive a great likeness in color, features, hair, aptness to cunning, dispositions for roving, etc."

Religious Connotations
Some of these writers were interested in Native American history, but most were interested in the Bible. Indeed, the Lost Tribe claim should be part of a general 19th-century fascination with biblical history. Explorations of Holy Land flora and fauna, the geography of the Holy Land, and the life of Jesus the man were very much en vogue. A close identification among some 17th and 18th-century Americans with the chosen people of Scripture helped Christian settlers see their colonization of New England as a reenactment of Israel's journey into the Promised Land.

It also contributed to a more general religious myth-making scheme that helped define the national identity of the United States. To cite just one example, in a 1799 Thanksgiving Day sermon, Abiel Tabbot told his congregation in Massachusetts:

"It has often been remarked that the people of the United States come nearer to a parallel with Ancient Israel than any other nation upon the globe. Hence, 'OUR AMERICAN ISRAEL' was a term that was frequently used, and common consent allows it apt and proper."

A curious incident that drew considerable attention and "proved," at least to some, that Indigenous Americans had ancient Israelite origins unfolded when tefillin phylacteries (Pronounced: tuh-FILL-in. These are the small boxes containing the words of the Shema that are traditionally wrapped around one's head and arm during morning prayers) were "discovered" in Pittsfield, Massachusetts in the early 19th century.
Phylacteries (Tefillin in Hebrew)
Their discoverer wrote that this "forms another link in the evidence by which our Indians are identified with the ancient Jews, who were scattered upon the face of the earth, and to this day remain a living monument, to verify and establish the eternal truths of Scripture."

Prominent Jews Respond
Around the time of the Pittsfield tefillin incident, Mordecai Manuel Noah, the journalist, playwright, politician, and Jewish American statesman, began writing about the subject. Noah wrote a play, She Would be a Soldier, or The Plains of Chippewa (1819), that resolved the tension between the Yankees and the British by identifying the Indian Great Spirit with the God of the Bible. Noah's ideas about Jewish Native Indian affinities grew in a distinctly political manner when he invited Native Americans to help settle "Ararat," the separatist Jewish colony he hoped to establish on Grand Island on the Niagara River around 1825.

Noah's writings on Jewish Native Indians came to their full expression with his Discourse on the Evidence of the American Indians Being the Descendants of the Lost Tribes of Israel (1837). The work documented a host of theological, linguistic, ritual, dietary, and political parallels between Jews and Indigenous Americans. Most importantly, he identified several essential character traits shared by the Jews and the Native Indians, all of which were highly laudable. For Noah, the conflation of Indians and Jews sanctioned the latter as divinely ordained Americans.

Another notable Jewish-Indian incident occurred in 1860 when stones hewn with Hebrew inscriptions were found in ancient Indian burial mounds near Newark, Ohio. The story unfolded over many months and was followed closely by The Israelite, The Occident, and The Jewish Messenger, whose respective editors represented the intellectual vanguard of American Jewry.
The Newark Holy Stones, a set of artifacts, were discovered in 1860 within a cluster of ancient Indian burial mounds near Newark, Ohio. The collection consists of (1) the Decalogue with its sandstone box, which has Hebrew inscriptions on all four sides, (3) the box top lid, (4) the box bottom, (2) the Keystone, and (5) a stone bowl.
Isaac Mayer Wise, the leader of the Reform movement in America, employed philological proofs to undermine the stone's authenticity. He rejected any connections between Jews and Indigenous Americans, though it's notable that he bothered to engage the story. Isaac Leeser, a traditionalist, sided in favor of the Lost Tribes theory. Reviewing the relics, The Occident, Leeser's newspaper, concluded, "The sons of Jacob were walking on the soil of Ohio many centuries before the birth of Columbus."
The letters on the Decalogue stone appear to be very early Hebrew. For the past 1000 years, Hebrew has most commonly been written with vowel points and consonant points missing on both the Decalogue and Keystone. The absence of points suggests but is not conclusive of earlier dates.
The Torah is written without accents or consonant points.
Implications
From a historical and scientific point of view, the Native American Lost Tribe claim is clearly Narishkeit (Yiddish for foolishness). But, even a brief exploration of who was making it and why, who was refuting it, and why reveals essential insights about American Jewry. Popular thought about who Jews were — their place in America, with whom they could or should be associated — helps us understand how Jews negotiated their place in American society. Theories about Ancient Israelite Indians should not be dismissed as mere fantasies; instead, they are important precisely because they are fantasies.

Jews responded to the Lost Tribes' claims about Indigenous Americans in sermons, plays, public statements, scholarly works, and popular writings. The critical responses are more understandable: from the perspective of Reform and science, the theory is flagrantly nonsensical. But there are other reasons some may have rejected it: so as not to be associated with that which was thought of as naive, primitive, and barbarian, so as not to be considered as atavistic or lower on the evolutionary ladder than other Europeans, so as not to be thought of as imminently disappearing from history, and so as not to need Christian civilizing (i.e., missionizing). On the other hand, advocates had to go against the scholarly consensus and side with religious figures who could be dismissed as fanatics.

Accepting Indigenous Americans as ancient Israelites had several (sometimes mutually exclusive) implications for American Jews. Foremost, it meant that the Indians were, in some way, related. It could buttress the sentiment that America was the New Jerusalem. This was the destined place where the original exiles, scattered to unknown corners of the world, were ingathered to their God-chosen Promised Land. They were not "lost" at all. Instead, the near aboriginal connection of Jews to American soil served as evidence of the end of exile and another reason to support a new American Jewish identity.

The connection between Indigenous Americans and Judaism seems clear. Among the Cherokee tribe, they carried an ark into battle, celebrated seven feasts, kept the seventh day of rest, had cities of refuge, and didn't eat pork.

Many of the significant figures in 19th-century American Jewry weighed in–in one manner or another–on the Jewish-Indian controversy. The practical stakes were never high, but the claim — so ubiquitous and so fluid (since it was used for so many different functions by so many other people) — was taken seriously and fretted over by Jewish leaders of very different orientations. The Lost Tribe theory had significant symbolic stakes — for Jews, Christians, and Indigenous Americans. Linking America and its earliest inhabitants with the Bible and its theology meant staking a claim on America–and championing God's plan for the New World.

Compiled by Dr. Neil Gale, Ph.D. 
#Jewish  #JewishThemed  #JewishLife



[1] The lost tribes are one of the biggest mysteries of Jewish history and have inspired multiple theories. Maybe the Igbo Jews of Nigeria are one of the lost tribes? Perhaps Bene Menashe, in Northern India, can claim the title. Or the Pashtun people of Afghanistan. Or Indigenous Americans. These groups and many more have claimed to have descended from the lost tribes of Israel.

[2] The ten lost tribes were ten of the Twelve Tribes of Israel that were said to have been deported from the Kingdom of Israel after its conquest by the Neo-Assyrian Empire circa 722 BCE.

Thursday, November 15, 2018

The Great Plains Indians in Illinois before the French Colonization of the Mississippi Valley in the mid-1600s.

THE ILLINOIS INDIAN TRIBES.
The Illiniwek Indian tribe was a Confederacy of tribes [aka: Illini and Illinois (pronounced as plural: Illinois')]; consisted of the KaskaskiaCahokiaPeoria, Tamaroa, Moingwena, Michigamea, Chepoussa, Chinkoa, Coiracoentanon, Espeminkia, Maroa, and Tapouara tribes. These three former bands of tribes, the Kaskaskia, Cahokia, and Peoria, occupied villages bearing their respective names, and the two latter lived north of Peoria Lake.

Much of what we know today about the early history of the Great Plains Indian tribes is from the French explorers recording some of the Indian tribes' verbal history that are passed down through specially trained storytellers who were forbidden from changing a single word.
Great Plains Indians west of the Mississippi River.
According to the statements of early French explorers in the mid-1600s, these Indians were the most numerous of all the tribes of the western frontier in the Mississippi Valley, occupying almost the entire territory now included within the State of Illinois boundaries.

Along the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers, from the mouth of Ohio to Lake Michigan, their villages were found at short intervals, and the vast country east and west of these rivers were their hunting-grounds, including the area known as Chécagou or Chicagou. Over this country herds of buffalo, elk and deer roamed for their benefit, and the many rivers were navigated only by their bark canoes. The French arrived in Chicago in the latter quarter of the 1600s.

The smoke from their camp-fires could be seen ascending, and the lonely forest groves reechoed their wild war screams. These Indians had many villages on the Illinois River, the largest and most important one, called La Vantum, which was located near the present site of Utica (Starved Rock). On account of the abundance of game (Illinois was known as the buffalo country), neighboring tribes frequently made this their hunting-ground, and although the Illinois Indians were not a warlike people, they would still resent an encroachment on their rights, consequently, many bloody battles were fought with the aggressors. More than 350 years ago the northern bands of the Illinois Indians became extinct, therefore most of their traditions are lost, still, there are some things relating to them preserved by the French pioneers which are related by their descendants in the American Bottom.

INDIAN ON INDIAN MASSACRE.
Near the village La Vantum, on the banks of the Illinois River and partly surrounded by a marshy outlet, was a place where the Indians held their annual religious feasts. On this ground was erected an altar, containing images of the different gods, and around which the Indians knelt in prayer while offering up sacrifices. At one of these feasts, all the warriors of the village and many from neighboring ones were gathered here engaged in religious exercises, while squaws with their children in papooses (used to carry a child on one's back) stood looking on, and mingling their voices in songs of praise.

The warriors, dispossessed of their arms, were engaged in devotion, the priests exhorting them in the ways of holiness, and receiving their annual offerings. While engaged in their services they were suddenly attacked by a large body of Potawatomi. Being taken by surprise, and unarmed, defense or escape appeared impossible, and many a brave warrior sang his death song and submitted to his fate. A few escaped by swimming the river, but most of them, including the women and children, fell as easy prey to the victorious enemy. Most of them were slain.
In 1493, on Columbus’ second voyage to the Americas, Spanish horses, representing Equus ferus caballus, were brought to North America, first in the Virgin Islands, and then in 1519, they were reintroduced on the continent, in modern-day Mexico, from where they radiated throughout the American Great Plains, after escape from their owners or by pilfering.
The victors collected all the valuables of the vanquished, including arms, clothing, camp equipment, furs, pelts, etc., loading them on horses, and with their spoils left for their homes on the Wabash River. The date of this tragical affair is not known, but it was before the French arrived or the future raids on these Indians by the Iroquois. For some time after the French came to this country the ground where this massacre took place was reportedly strewn with human bones.

RAID OF THE IROQUOIS.
The Seneca Iroquois, a part of the Six Nations or Iroquois League (Haudenosaunee) moved down from the Ontario region to New York well before the American Revolution.
Famous Seneca Chief of the Union of Six Nations (Iroquois League), Red Jacket.
The Iroquois made frequent raids on the tribes of the Illinois prairie, destroying their villages, killing women and their children, and carrying away large quantities of pelts, furs, etc., which they sold to English traders. According to tradition, in one of those raids, they imprisoned 800 Indians, mostly women and children, marching them to their village on the bank of Seneca Lake in New York and then burning them to death. 

The Iroquois, having been trading with the British (or "English," as they call them) at Albany, New York, had armed themselves with muskets, which gave them a target distance advantage over the Illinois, who used only bows and arrows at this time period. 
NOTE: The Great Plains Indians could shoot six arrows to every one shot from a musket. {{Matchlock guns, used in the 1400s, were fired by holding a burning wick to a "touch hole" in the barrel igniting the powder inside. In 1509 the wheel lock was invented, generating a spark mechanically. With no wick to keep lit, the wheel lock was easier to use, and more reliable than the matchlock. The flintlock ignition system, beginning in 1630, reigned for two centuries, with virtually no alteration.}}
These frequent raids of the Iroquois were for spoil only, and not for conquest, as they made no effort to take possession of the country. The Illinois were rich in horses, furs, pelts, trinkets, etc., and the robbers would return loaded with the spoils of battle. One time they brought back over 300 horses loaded with valuables. It is said the traders at Albany encouraged these robberies by furnishing the Iroquois with war implements, liquor, and buying the stolen goods.

On account of the frequent raids on the Illinois tribes, they became reduced in numbers, which caused them to fall easy prey to the neighboring tribes for some years after. A number of tribes combined, forming an alliance against the Illinois Indians, which resulted in near annihilation, and the occupation of the prairie country by the victors.

The Great Plains tribes formed the "Illinois Confederacy(aka: Illiniwek or Illini), to strengthen their numbers. The tribes included the Kaskaskia, Cahokia, Peoria, Tamaroa, Moingwena, Michigamea, Chepoussa, Chinkoa, Coiracoentanon, Espeminkia, Maroa, and Tapouara.

Additional Reading: Click on the hyperlinks provided in the article.

Compiled by Neil Gale, Ph.D.